Cobra wrote:I read this article also and I can tell you its total BS by the league. The kid should not be banned at all and they are sending the wrong message to the other kids.
Way back when I coached fast pitch softball for my daughters league there was a girl who was rated #1 in the state. She was on the Championship team each year. Funny how all the good players ended up on the same team for the 3 years she pitched in this league. The only reason they want this kid out is because "He turned down the offer to join the defending championship team" !!!!!
Had he done so, not a word would have been said. Since he made up his own mind they want him out !!!
Very sad !!!!
I coached kids basketball and little league for years. Even then, it would have been a good idea if parents were banned from the activities!!! LOL
The kid should be allowed to play in his team of his choice (or where he was drafted, whatever the case may be). The kids facing him should learn to try to hit him, develop their skills. That's what that level is for. Instead of taking their ball and going home and forfeiting games. What a bunch of babies!! At least here, the kids are only allowed to throw 70 pitches and then must not pitch again for 4 days. With a similar rule there (and there should be) how often would they face him anyway????
He was given the choice of moving up to the 13-year-old league. He declined. There is a HUGE physical difference in 9 and 13, and I don't think he should have moved up either.
I didn't coach at the time, but had a 9-year-old stepson who was in a league where he and one other kid both pitched hard (and were both actually clocked faster than this kid.) No one complained, or forfeited, or took their ball (and kids) and went home, nor even suggested these two not be allowed to pitch. They competed, learned not to be afraid of it. They faced each others teams in the championship game. It was fun to watch.